A recent ruling by the Hawaii Supreme Court upheld a state law that prohibits individuals from bearing arms in public. The court’s decision, which cites the “Aloha Spirit” as grounds for restricting public carrying of firearms, directly contradicts both the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and a recent decision by the U.S. Supreme
This bill would prohibit the carry of firearms by responsible gun owners in what they are calling “sensitive places.” This is yet another example of a state attempting to restrict the right of many abiding citizens who have the desire to protect their loved ones in public places. Creating these types of gun-free zones do
This bill would open up constitutional carry in the State of Louisiana. Law abiding citizens would have the ability to legally carry a concealed handgun without a permit to concealed carry. The bill does take into account areas in which carrying a concealed weapon would still be restricted, with or without a permit.
This bill would require networks involved in transactions involving firearms to make a specific merchant category code for firearms and ammunition available to those who process transactions for firearms merchants. A processor must assign the code to each firearms merchant to which the processor provides services.
This bill would put significant restrictions on concealed carry in a long list of public places, and narrow the pool of eligible firearm safety instructors across the state. These restrictions would affect millions of Californians and limit their access to crucial education and training needed to practice self-defense.
The bill would prohibit “payment card networks” from requiring merchant category codes for a purchase that identifies a merchant as a firearms retailer. It would also prohibit the Wisconsin Department of Justice from maintaining a list of firearm purchases based on information from its background checks. No other government entity would be allowed to keep
This bill would give the state of New York and its government full control over criteria that would certify firearm instructors. After a certain period, all certified instructors would have to go through an entirely new process to obtain certification.
House Bill 114 would increase the number of regulations on the firearm industry in the state, making it difficult to operate a business. It would increase liability for these businesses attempting to advertise legal products and/or conduct lawful business activities. It is a heavily targeted legislation that aims to restrict lawful and legitimate firearms industry
This legislation seeks to remove references to the USCCA in certain sections of the Code. It would restrict the number of department-certified instructors, and remove the ability for the USCCA to certify ranges and instructors for firearm training. This bill would put a large number of Virginians at risk of losing access to essential components