Weekly Spotlight 9/1/25 – 9/6/25
String Of False Active Shooter Incidents Underscore Urgent Need For Campus Preparedness
As colleges and universities welcome students back this semester, a troubling pattern has emerged: a string of false active shooter reports disrupting campuses nationwide. While these incidents proved unfounded, they highlight a critical reality: students and faculty must be prepared to respond decisively should a real threat occur.
Safety on college campuses is unique, complex, and requires more than just relying on traditional tools for self-defense. While the landscape is changing, most college campuses still prohibit firearms, so students must ensure their safety through heightened situational awareness, proactive planning, and clear decision-making under stress are many of the most important defenses available. By strengthening these skills, students, parents, and faculty alike can face today’s campus environment with greater confidence.
The USCCA is committed to equipping students and faculty with practical skills and non-lethal strategies, including threat recognition, de-escalation techniques and creative problem-solving that can be applied in everyday campus life and in moments of crisis. These skills can empower those on campus to stay vigilant, remain adaptable and reduce their exposure to potential threats in places where defensive tools are restricted. Safety, at its core, is about a mindset and we emphasize the value of education that prepares people to thrive, no matter the circumstances.
Preparation is the foundation of safety. That’s why we provide a wide range of resources designed to give families and students the knowledge, confidence, and readiness to protect themselves and others—ensuring that safety is never left to chance. The USCCA is proud to offer a host of relevant materials to help all campus-goers prepare for times of crisis.
OTHER NEWS YOU MAY HAVE MISSED
Guns.com (Connecticut): Court Upholds Connecticut ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban As New Suit Filed In Massachusetts
August 25, 2025
Chris Eger
A federal appeals court last week ruled on one state’s prohibition of popular semi-automatic firearms, while a new challenge was filed in the same region. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals on Aug. 22 affirmed the denial of preliminary injunctions in the case of National Association for Gun Rights v. Lamont, which challenged Connecticut’s 2013 ban. While not snuffing out the case altogether, the court upheld a 2023 judge’s decision in the case, citing it was unlikely to succeed on its merits, while it largely ducked the bar set by the Supreme Court in Bruen to use history and tradition to weigh modern bans against those set in the past.
The Reload: Analysis: DOJ Expounds On Its View Of The Second Amendment
The Department of Justice (DOJ) just provided new insights into where it believes the Second Amendment’s outer limits lie. The first came in the form of a newly published letter to Congress outlining the reasons why it declined to appeal a Fifth Circuit decision striking down the federal ban on gun dealers selling pistols to 18-to-20-year-olds. The second is derived from a Supreme Court brief the DOJ filed in a case where a woman who wrote bad checks decades ago is trying to win back her gun rights.
The Truth About Guns: Pro-Second Amendment Missouri Attorney General Named FBI Co-Deputy Director
It is heartening to gun owners to see that the Trump Administration, quite the opposite of the previous administration, doesn’t fill top roles in essential law enforcement agencies with rabid anti-gunners. It’s even better still when President Donald Trump appoints solid pro-Second Amendment thinkers to such positions. That’s the case with the recent appointment of Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey being appointed the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s (FBI’s) co-deputy director.
Bloomberg Law (Massachusetts): Gun Advocates Challenge Massachusetts Assault-Style Weapons Ban
A Massachusetts law restricting the sale and possession of “assault-style” firearms is unconstitutional and inconsistent with the history of weapons regulations in the US, a group of gun owners and sellers assert. The statute imposes “sweeping arms bans, magazine restrictions, registration requirements, and licensing preconditions” that are “unprecedented in our Nation’s historical tradition,” the National Rifle Association of America and others alleged in a complaint filed Thursday in the US District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The plaintiffs—who also include four individuals, a gun shop, and the Gun Owners Action League—assert violations of the Second, Fifth, and Fourteenth amendments.
###