Political Shift in New York City Prompts Sharp Uptick In Concealed Carry Applications
As political dynamics shift nationwide, and in major cities like New York many residents are no longer waiting to see what comes next. Concerned about potential reductions in police resources, evolving gun regulations, and overall public safety, New Yorkers are increasingly taking measures to protect themselves while they still can.
Recent reporting shows that concealed-carry permit applications have surged following the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision and the October 7 attacks in Israel. Mandatory 16-hour safety courses are filling faster than instructors can offer them, marking a significant change in a city long known for having some of the strictest gun laws in the country.
Much of this momentum stems from the Bruen ruling in 2022, which reshaped New York’s permitting system. But recent elections appear to have accelerated the trend. With uncertainty surrounding future policy direction, many applicants say their motivation is simple: if they don’t act now, they may not get another opportunity.
Firearms instructors report that their classrooms are now filled with everyday New Yorkers — people who cite rising crime, unpredictable subway conditions, and political volatility as reasons for seeking training.
Still, the process is far from easy. Applicants must complete extensive safety coursework and navigate a permitting system that can take months. Even after approval, permit holders face strict limitations on where they can legally carry, with broad “sensitive location” designations that cover much of daily life in the city. Combined with concerns over potential political changes, many see this moment as the most practical time to begin the process.
Similar trends have emerged in states like Colorado, where so-called “gun control” measures have prompted residents to take steps to safeguard their Second Amendment rights. In New York, a growing number of residents are doing the same: getting trained, getting certified, and preparing themselves proactively for whatever may come next.
###
OTHER NEWS YOU MAY HAVE MISSED
The Truth About Guns: Proposed Federal Measure Would Partially Repeal Biden’s Prized Gun Control Law
A measure recently introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives would do away with some portions of President Joe Biden’s crown gun-control achievement—the so-called Bipartisan Safer Communities Act (BSCA). On November 12, U.S. Rep. Wesley Hunt, R-Texas, introduced the Second Amendment Restoration Act, which would partially repeal the BSCA, signed into law by President Biden in 2022. Interestingly, it was Texas U.S. Sen. John Cornyn who crossed party lines and supported the measure, allowing the president and other gun-ban advocates to tout the legislation as bipartisan.
Ammoland: President Trump Protects Veterans’ Second Amendment Rights With New Law
President Donald Trump signed into law a legislative proposal to reopen the federal government. Included in the legislation is a provision that prohibits the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from stripping the constitutional right of veterans to possess a firearm simply because they have been appointed a fiduciary to manage their benefits. While the NRA applauds President Trump and Congress for extending these protections for another year, the time has come for Congress to pass the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act (H.R. 1041/S.478), which will permanently prohibit the VA from submitting the names of veterans to NICS without due process.
Guns.com: Lawmakers Urge Justice Department To Disavow The National Firearms Act
While Congress pulled its punch on scrapping the NFA earlier this year, some lawmakers on Capitol Hill are calling on the Attorney General to write off the tax scheme altogether. U.S. Rep. Andrew Clyde, a Georgia FFL holder and Republican Congressman, has joined with 30 other House GOP members to urge U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to give the National Firearms Act of 1934 short shrift and treat it as if its days are numbered. Fundamentally, Clyde points out that the House majority supported removing suppressors and short-barreled firearms from the NFA, while the Senate only zeroed out the tax on those items.
Guns.com (California): California’s Magazine Ban Is Now Before The Supreme Court
A challenge to California’s “high capacity” magazine ban is still alive before the nation’s high court and has been distributed to the justices for consideration. Duncan v. Bonta, formerly Duncan v. Becerra, has been working its way through the federal court system since July 2017 and has seen some success, including a 2023 ruling in which U.S. District Court Judge Roger Benitez found the ban to be unconstitutional. However, an en banc court of the U.S. Ninth Circuit this March overturned Benitez’s ruling, setting up an appeal by the plaintiffs to the U.S. Supreme Court.
###